by Mitch Byers :: July 26th, 2006 :: Posted in Selection & Hiring |
Speed interviewing involves running through numerous applicants in 10- to 15-minute interview blocks; it’s based on the fact that we all make up our minds about someone in seconds anyway. Large companies such as RONA and Vidéotron have used it recently to add dozens to the payroll at once. “It’s being used more and at many different levels,” says Tim Cork, president of NEXCareer, a career transition consultancy in Toronto. “You can move people through efficiently and do comparison shopping.
A couple of thoughts:
Keywords: Selection & Hiring permalink :: No Comments »
by Mitch Byers :: July 26th, 2006 :: Posted in Selection & Hiring |
The previous post was loosely organized around original thought, training, and effective communications. Gerry Grispin has a bag full of original thoughts. In his Of Job Jars and Hi-Pot, he shares his experience of engaging a group of recruiters into a discussion of metrics, dashboards, and retention. They came up with several thoughts on retaining hi-performance employees including sponsoring joint projects (synergy between departments) and engaging hi-performance employees in short-term projects outside their particular expertise. The latter plan does double duty: it improves the agility of the firm (cross-training) and provides personal employee development.
Sure, lots of firms have hashed over similar ideas for retention, but I don’t think anyone has ever been able to pull together a room full of staffing strategist from competing firm and come up with a focused plan of action. That is an original thought. Thanks Gerry.
Keywords: Selection & Hiring permalink :: No Comments »
by Mitch Byers :: July 25th, 2006 :: Posted in Selection & Hiring |
Scott Axel asks an honest question, Are there any original thoughts out there? Scott laments that his goal is to “take at least one new idea way with me from every training session/book chapter/outline course that I do.” With so much of our professional time fractured, productivity is less than optimimum. When we go above the call of duty and attend a seminar or class even mandatory company training, or even read an industry newsletter, often we “get vomited all over” – to use Scott’s comments. Productivity and morale, instead of going up, begin to slip and slide. The material’s goals become counterproductive.
Sure training is about knowledge transfer, but the challenge is to have the audience “own” the concepts – that means engaging them in one or more exercises (individual or group) so their mind and emotions are involved. Knowledge has to soak into the soul before we believe it and use it.
“Original Thoughts” are rare. Original training may be even more scarce.
Keywords: Selection & Hiring permalink :: No Comments »
by Mitch Byers :: July 8th, 2006 :: Posted in Enhancing Your Career, Selection & Hiring |
Recently, I was honored to speak to the International Institute of Business Analyst (IIBA) in Plano, Texas. The IIBA is a professional association for Business Analysis professionals. The organization develops and maintains standards for the practice of business analysis and for the certification of practitioners.
One of the exercises the group participated in was the development of a competency model for Business Analysts. The exercise consisted of each participant (approximately 30) choosing their own top six competency from a master list of 24 competencies. The list of 24 competencies cover up to 98% of captured job behaviors.
Richard Boyatzis, a professor for organizational behavior, defines job competency as, “An underlying characteristic of an employee which results in effective and/or superior performance.” Competencies are sometimes referred to as differentiating factors. Any given position will have 6-10 associated competencies. This selected group of competencies make up the Competency Model.
Below is the Competency Model the group identified for superior performance for a Business Analyst. The numbers reflect how many people identified this particular competency as one of their top six.
MAIN COMPETENCIES:
Analytical Thinking – 27 Sees implications or consequences; Analyzes situations systematically; Anticipates obstacles and ways to get around them, thinks ahead; Analyzes what is needed to accomplish goal
Customer Service Orientation – 19 Discovers and meets underlying needs of internal and external customers; Follows through on requests and complaints; Becomes a trusted advisor to the customer
Integrity – 16 Is honest and forthright, trustworthy; Takes responsibility for own mistakes, does not blame others; High standard of ethical conduct
Flexibility – 16 Understands validity of opposing view points; Willingness to modify preferred routine; Modifies behavior in response to new information, changing conditions, or unexpected obstacles; Adapts behavior to best suit the situation; Adapts to change without anxiety
Information Seeking – 15 Gathers information systematically; Seeks information from many sources; Gets out to see or touch the situation; Asks questions, looks deeper, presses for resolution
Initiative – 14 Seizes opportunities as they arise; Handles crisis effectively; Tenacity in reaching goals; Willingness to work long hours, as needed; Persistent, does not give up when faced with difficult obstacles or rejection
SECONDARY COMPETENCIES
Conceptual Thinking – 11 Sees patterns not obvious to others; Notices inconsistencies; Reviews complex data and identifies relationships from disparate sources; Able to convey ideas through original analogies and metaphors
Teamwork and Cooperation – 11 Solicits input from others and involves others in issues that will impact them; Provides credit and recognition to others; Encourages and empowers the group; Works to develop teamwork and cooperation; Improves morale, resolves conflicts; Strives for win/win solutions
Achievement Orientation – 9 Measures results, makes cost-benefit analysis; Finds better, more efficient ways of doing things; Sets specific, challenging goals; Makes good person/organization match to improve performance
Having a competency list for superior performers is a key step in recruiting and screening individuals for the role. The next step would be to develop specific job related questions related to each of the six main and three secondary competencies. These will be behavioral-based and include follow-up probing questions. As an example, for initiative:
Provide an example of a time you felt like you worked hard, maybe beyond your normal capacity, to complete an assignment, or reach a goal.
Follow-up: What motivated to you? What were the results?
Setting up a competency model, complimented with probing behavioral-based interview questions is as an excellent way to find the superior employee.
Keywords: Enhancing Your Career, Selection & Hiring permalink :: No Comments »
by Mitch Byers :: July 3rd, 2006 :: Posted in Enhancing Your Career, Interviewing to Win, Selection & Hiring |
HOW COMPANIES UNCOVER CORE COMPETENCIES THROUGH BEHAVIORAL INTERVIEWS
Part II: THE CASE FOR BEHAVIORAL INTERVIEWS
Introduction A special category of structured interviews is the behavioral interview. While “traditional” interviews focus on knowledge, skills, and abilities (commonly referred to as KSA), the goal of the behavioral interview is to uncover your motivation and past work experiences. Companies choose to utilize a structured interview format in an effort to uncover your job-related behaviors – such as situational judgments, integrity under pressure, or your adaptability. The hiring manager wants to understand how you behave in a work environment. They want to be able to see who you are, day-to-day.
Current Trends Over the last 10 to 15 years, more companies are have moved toward structured interviews. A study of 202 Canadian organizations found 83% of the firms use structured interviews and 46% specifically incorporate behavioral interviews in their selection process. Back in the 1990s, only five percent of Fortune 500 companies used some type of assessment tool, such as behavioral interviewing or pre-employment assessment tests. Today, approximately 65% of the Fortune 500 companies are using behavioral assessments.
The increased usage of behavioral interviews is supported by a wealth of books espousing the virtues of the formal interview process. Additionally, training offered by pre-employment assessment companies and workshops offered through industry conferences are permeating the Human Resource profession. Behavioral interviewing is, more and more, becoming the norm.
Follow-up Probes If you participate in a behavioral interview, you can expect the interviewer to ask follow-up “probes” to gain additional insight into your experience. Probing follow-up questions will help the company understand the “why” behind your answers. From the interviewer’s perspective, understanding the “why” is often just as important, if not more so, than understanding the action itself. Probing questions should be expected, especially in higher-level positions requiring critical decisions or positions with significant client interface. Explaining the “why” requires critical thinking, analysis of various factors, and the ability to successfully articulate the thought process – all vital to positions of significant responsibility.
Core CompetenciesIn a formal behavioral interview, questions are tied directly to job competencies. There are 24 individual job competencies which cover a majority of professional positions. Each competency has unique characteristics and is complimentary to one or more of the other competencies.
Part III will continue the discussion of Behavioral Interviews and common Core Competencies.
by Mitch Byers :: June 3rd, 2006 :: Posted in Interviewing to Win, Selection & Hiring |
Part I: The Case for Structured or Unstructured Interviews
Unstructured Interviews
There are two formal interview categories: Unstructured and Structured. Unstructured interviews are defined as a method of collecting information in which the interviewer starts with only a general sense of the topic and creates questions as the interaction proceeds. Unstructured interviews are often expressed as a loosely organized interview that are “personalized” for the job seeker.
One advantage of an unstructured interview is the questions are typically asked in a spontaneous manner, enabling the job seeker to engage in a broader discussion of their background. Most folks respond well in unstructured interviews. In fact, they view both the hiring company and the individual interviewer more positively because they feel free to request information and because the interviewer is able to express warmth and friendliness through more personalized interactions. Patrice Buzzanell notes in her research that when candidates are given the “opportunity to provide input, they evaluate decision making as fairer, even when outcomes are unfavorable to them.”
Because an unstructured interview is less “constrained,” it could be argued the applicant’s job seekers’ will vary more, thus providing a more accurate personality assessment. It is generally accepted that unstructured interviews can assess social skills with a high degree of reliability. A study by Salgado and Moscoso concludes, “more socially skilled people will have greater possibilities of being successful in a conventional interview,” as compared to a more structured interview.
Structured Interviews
In contrast to the unstructured interview, the structured interview follows scripted questions. The same set of questions you will be asked are the same posed to others being interviewed. The company reasons their decision-makers can make a more objective decision if each candidate is interviewed in a similar manner. If fact, numerous researchers agree structured interviews based upon formal job analysis are generally more valid and reliable than unstructured interviews.
Companies choose the structured interview for various reasons. Some feel the structured interview is the best vehicle to complete their internal due diligence process. They want to feel the screening process has been fair and objective to all candidates. Structured interviews are sometimes chosen by the hiring company to reveal potential ethical issues, such as a propensity towards theft and security violations. Research has shown that workers who are punitive about thieves are less likely to be thieves themselves. Other companies have indicated they specifically chose structured interviews because they minimize the possibilities for lawsuits based on EEO [Equal Employment Opportunity] bias.
Part II will continue the discussion of Structured Interviews and introduce the Behavioral Interview.
Keywords: Interviewing to Win, Selection & Hiring permalink :: No Comments »