by Mitch Byers :: January 29th, 2006 :: Posted in Interviewing to Win |
From time to time, we all find ourselves in the state of job transition. The job transition may be because of a plant closing or industry consolidation. Or, like John, maybe your job transition is self-imposed. John has been in his role for several years and is ready to step up the corporate ladder. John has received excellent performance reviews. He even took time to get industry certification. However, that doesn’t mean his next job is going to land in his lap.
John knows he has plenty of competition. And he remembers past interviews. The hiring manager seemed interested in him, but after the interview, things fizzled. The hiring manager got distracted – he was off to meetings, was putting out fires, or had an out of town trip. John was a viable candidate, but he somehow got lost in the shuffle. John needs a plan to help him stand out from the crowd. One simple strategy is Memory Triggers.
A Memory Trigger is simply a real life story of your professional experience. Authors Danielle Beu and M Ronald Buckley note that career stories help document or prove a candidate’s claim in the interview – to a strong work ethic, a particular competency, or their interpersonal or leadership skills. The authors reason that interview stories, when well-constructed and well-delivered will help [you] stand out from the crowd by serving as a memory trigger for the interviewer. Providing a solid memory trigger gives the hiring manager something concrete they can remember. In fact, a well-delivered memory trigger should linger in their minds up to the point of the hiring decision.
Constructing Memory Triggers is a simple three-step process. When John is asked about his experience at a particular company, he can deliver his career story in three layers, or as I like to call it, PAR: an acronym for Problem, Action, Results: o First, John sets up a business problem. Say the business problem was redundant data – too much information on too many reports o The second layer is Action. John will spend a moment to explain his specific involvement related to the business problem. John can share how he gathered data and how he analyzed the reports to pinpoint the redundancy. o Finally, John needs to express the positive results of his actions. The results need to be specific. Sharing that he consolidated 6 reports to 4 will have greater impact than simply saying he improved the reporting process. Providing quantifiable results better enables the hiring manager to envision John succeeding.
John needs to deliver his Memory Triggers with confidence and genuine enthusiasm, moving smoothly through each of the three layers. However, John’s stories do not need to be long and involved. In fact, his Memory Triggers should be short, punchy, and to the point. The stories should not be diluted with excess details. If more details are needed, the hiring manager will ask.
Memory Triggers – compact career stories that highlight a business Problem, your Actions, and your specific impact on the outcome – a great strategy to take on your next job interview.
Keywords: Interviewing to Win permalink :: No Comments »
by Mitch Byers :: January 22nd, 2006 :: Posted in Uncategorized |
Mary Clark is a CPA with over 10 years experience with Royal Financial Partners. Recently, she was notified the local branch would be consolidated with the Houston office. In 30 days, she will be out of a job.
Mary has secured several interviews, but is concerned about how to answer the question, What are your salary requirements? Maybe Mary will answer, Considering my CPA status and 10 years in the finance industry, I am expecting a salary of between $75,000 and $85,000. Or Mary might respond, As a Finance Specialist, my base was $70,000 and I was eligible for an annual performance bonus.
Salary issues can easily become a tug-of-war between the potential employee and the hiring company. Mary is looking for an effective way to respond to the Salary Question, but not feel defensive in her approach.
In order to create a more neutral environment, Mary will need to remove the I and My from her responses. Instead of using the word salary, she will adopt the term value. Now, instead of talking about her salary requirements, Mary will be answering the Salary Question in terms of value.
As an example, say that Margaret is interviewing Mary: Margaret asks: Mary, as you think about your next career move, what are your salary requirements? Mary responds: Currently, Royal Financial Partners values the Financial Specialist position with a base of $70,000 and a provides an annual performance bonus, or Salary research indicates a tenured CPA with similar experience is valued at a base between $75,000 and $85,000.
Reframing the Salary Question in terms of Value takes away much of the tension associated with answering the Salary Question. At no point in her answer did Mary use the words I, Me, My, or Salary. The conversation is not about Mary (the skilled candidate) and Margaret (the hiring manager), but about the value companies place on certain competencies and Marys perceived value in the marketplace.
After answering the Salary Question, it is then Marys obligation to ask Margaret not about salary, but about value. Mary asks, Margaret, would you please share how the company values this position?
Margaret may reveal the Financial Specialist position is in line with Marys salary research, and has a base of between $75,000 and $85,000, a spread of $10,000. Mary will be proactive and ask, Margaret, would it be correct to assume then, that the midpoint for the position is $80,000? Margaret nodes in agreement.
Mary now knows that $80,000 is the midpoint, the minimum salary she should accept. By providing a straightforward answer and asking follow-up questions, Mary has done double duty she has provided Margaret relevant compensation information and has set minimum expectations for the job offer.
In this scenario, Mary did not let the Salary Question become a tug of war. Instead of a defensive approach, Mary allowed the Salary Question to be an equal exchange of information. Now, she can move forward through the balance of interview process with a higher level of confidence.
Keywords: Uncategorized permalink :: No Comments »